Originally Posted by
M1911
I'll give a little background about myself before I weigh in on this issue. I first joined IDPA around 2001. I've been most active in the last few years. I'm an SO. I regularly shoot local matches and I'm often running a squad. I've competed in about half a dozen sanctioned matches. I've worked the New England Regional match the last two years. I'm classified as Expert in a couple divisions, Sharpshooter in another. I competed in S&W Indoor Nationals last year and had signed up for the match this year.
I am also a member of USPSA, but only shot a couple matches last year. That will change this year.
I chose not to attend this years Indoor Nationals (even though I had registered and paid my fee) because of Code of Conduct that we were required to sign.
I have no problem with a match having a code of conduct that requires good sportsmanship and safe gun handling. No one likes competitors behaving badly and when it comes to safe gun handling, that is not up for debate.
But this Code of Conduct went far beyond that. I won't always be a champion of IDPA and I will not agree to be muzzled. Frankly, I probably wouldn't have said anything about the IDPA rules at the match -- I would have been too busy figuring out my stage plan and visualizing it, and bitching would have reduced my focus.
But I simply will not abide when someone tells me to shut the heck up. And that is what IDPA has been doing lately.
When it comes to the new rules, IMO IDPA blew it. The flat-footed reloads rule is, in my opinion, simply wrong. Their justification of it -- tactical Teddy's told us so -- is simply not believable. Are there situations where it makes a lot more sense to complete a reload while stationary? Absolutely. In fact, probably most of the time. On the other hand, there are situations when it might make sense to run like heck while reloading, and reloading on the move is a valuable defensive skill.
I have tried to change IDPA from within. I sent comments on the proposed rules to IDPA HQ. Joyce gave their response in the Tactical Journal -- "IDPA isn't for everyone." In other words, shut the heck up or leave.
The latest clarification of the rules made it worse. Now, even while at a single point of cover, you can't move your feet while reloading because that would be "advancing to another point of cover." In other words, a single point of cover is now no longer a single point of cover.
And then we get to the S&W Indoor Nationals and Joyce's decision to make up rules or ignore rules as she pleases. National matches must publish their courses of fire 14 days prior to the match. That is in the new rule book. At this year's SWIN, they posted the COF two days before the match. When I pointed this out to Joyce, she said (I paraphrase) "I won't criticize the SOs because they are working so hard preparing for the match." Well, you know what? I've helped set up the NER two years in a row. I know how hard it is. But if she isn't going to enforce the rule, then why is it in the rule book? She wouldn't answer that.
Were there safe tables at this year's SWIN? The rule book requires them. There weren't any at last year's SWIN. Yet another rule ignored by Joyce and company.
Last year's SWIN had an illegal stage. Another rule ignored.
I know the guys running SWIN. They are good guys. They work hard. I know about the accident at Hartford and the individual being sued. I contributed to his defense fund at the last NER. This isn't personal against the guys at SWIN.i
Regarding the positive comments about NER, those are greatly appreciated. I know that in the past couple years the MDs at NER tried hard to make stages that were challenging for Master level shooters but also completable by Marksmen. Masters could go for the gusto, take risks and maybe make up a lot of time. But the goal wasn't to have Marksmen screwed by targets that disappeared before they could clear their holster.
In my opinion, some of IDPA's problems stem from the fact that the folks in charge (Joyce Fowler, Rob Ray, etc.) are basically marksmen (despite what their classifications might be). They simply make bad decisions.
A number of my shooter friends have made similar decisions about IDPA. Two long time shooters that are buddies went to USPSA exclusively last year. I know a distinguished master who is tossing it in for the same reasons. And I know a safety officer instructor who is doing the same.
It is a mistake to dismiss us as malcontents and dismiss our criticisms. These people getting chased away are the backbone of IDPA. We are the SOs and MDs. We are the people who write the courses of fire, get their early for setup, and stay late for tear down. And many of us have had enough with the arrogance of IDPA HQ.