"R.I.P" Radically Invasive Projectile".

[DocGKR]

Use of deadly force was either warranted or not.

[Nephrology]

Use of deadly force was either warranted or not.

To stop a threat. not to maim them.

Obviously it would be armchair lawyering to suggest that this product will/will not result in legal liability, but from the marketing alone I would be hesitant to carry something like this. Even if it worked, which from the looks of things it probably doesn't.

[Chuck Haggard]

Use of deadly force was either warranted or not.

I know that, and you know that, however, comma, I wouldn't want to be in a shooting that was somehow perceived as iffy and then have to deal with this kind of crap on top of that.

I look at what Erick is going through and think of how I can reduce my chances of having to deal with something like that, or at least reduce my issues. Even in "law and order" type places such as KS such issues pop up, we had a civilian going through a trial for murder off of a home defense shooting. Although there were other problems with the case, that defender dude used an SKS was a huge hook that prompted our DA to prosecute, and to go for first degree.

[JHC]

I feel dirty just for watching that.
However a have a couple questions. 1) what bounced off the denim after he fired? or was that just me seeing things?
2) why is the hole in the denim on the right but the entry hole int he gel on the left half of the block?
I could be mistaken but I'll be damned if I'm gonna look at that thing again.

lol I have no idea. My big thing is pistol fragments just haven't packed the mass to really accomplish much at pistol velocities and I can't see how these will be any different.

[JHC]

SG Ammo has this listed as "coming soon"

For $44.95 a box of 20


They must be hand made by combat monks in a secret cave in Tibet.

wow, I'd buy some Buffalo Bore of anything at that price. Some of their .45 acp penetrators even. lol

[Joe in PNG]

I'm seeing the marketing plan here:
1) Stir up the anti's. Get some bans in the works
2) Sell as "The Ammo that (famous antigunner) doesn't want you to have!"
3) Panic buying!!! Act now before it's banned!! Pelosireidobama!!!
4) Profit!

[hufnagel]

is it wrong to want some just to be able to show people and go... "this is the reason why we can't have nice things." ?

[DanH]

I'm seeing the marketing plan here:
1) Stir up the anti's. Get some bans in the works
2) Sell as "The Ammo that (famous antigunner) doesn't want you to have!"
3) Panic buying!!! Act now before it's banned!! Pelosireidobama!!!
4) Profit!

I have to admit part of me is jealous I didn't think of it first.
Nobody ever went broke betting on stupid.

[Mitchell, Esq.]

Use of deadly force was either warranted or not.

I wouldn't bother with this stuff because I have Ranger Talon available, so I can get in trouble with a bullet that has sharp claws and terminal effectiveness instead of...

Well... this stuff.

[KookaRocha]

Granted, this is long. But this is the 'discussion' I just had on Facebook. Some people are just eager to be sold BS. Whatever, I tried. (I'm Joe)