I could go for one of these if they made it in .380ACP Long Rifle.
I could go for one of these if they made it in .380ACP Long Rifle.
--Josh
“Formerly we suffered from crimes; now we suffer from laws.” - Tacitus.
I missed it: what did he say that was a Freudian slip?
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk
"If you run into an a**hole in the morning, you ran into an a**hole. If you run into a**holes all day, you're the a**hole." - Raylan Givens
--Josh
“Formerly we suffered from crimes; now we suffer from laws.” - Tacitus.
"You guys have been asking for this".
I want to know which of you guys asked Glock to build this? What were you thinking?
“If you know the way broadly you will see it in everything." - Miyamoto Musashi
^^^I thought it was funny.
Dipping into the irony reservoir even further, given the dimensions and pressure of the cartridge, and the size/design of the 42, I wouldn't be surprised if this thing was GTG for 2000 right out of the box; they've probably solved that problem. But only people who get issued one as a BUG are likely to find out: most buyers probably won't shoot it that often, and most shooters probably won't buy it that often.
I mentioned earlier in this thread that on Glock's "Glock ID" site (launched about a year ago now), they did a poll right out of the gate about what the public wanted from Glock. Single Stack 9mm won the poll. Glock wasn't listening to anyone on this one.
The poll question was; What product would you like to see next from Glock?
Choices were: with result percentages.
Single Stack .45: 22%
Different Color Glocks: 28%
Single Stack 9mm: 38%
Folding Knife: 12%
So, .380 single stack the size of M&P Shield, with one less capacity wasn't even on the poll. I don't think Glock really gets the big picture anymore. Maybe they never really did. They have nothing at all that I'm willing to buy.