Right, but they have presented no evidence that he "engaged in the business" of dealing in firearms. It's a term of art. There are specific elements they need to prove, and there are no facts in...
Type: Posts; User: joshs
Right, but they have presented no evidence that he "engaged in the business" of dealing in firearms. It's a term of art. There are specific elements they need to prove, and there are no facts in...
Where is the discrepancy? It looks like he transferred most of the assets to the S Corp, but still retained some as a sole proprietor, so he reported them on the 1040. Also, the indictment doesn't...