Printable View
I’m thinking I’d like to try a RDS on my G19 again but in a world of Cheeto dust, donut powder and falling tears I’d prefer an enclosed optic. The SCS 320 looks interesting, we tried test sitting one on my #4 MOS plate and it looks like it’s a good fit that might let me keep my present iron sights.
Before I drop $400 on a new optic am I missing something?
Nope, the SCS 320 is actually one of the best DPP footprint optics on the market!
I have an SCS MOS for the direct mount, extremely low profile, but if I wanted a larger window and enclosed emitter i would absolutely use the SCS 320. If I had a gun cut for a DPP, an SCS 320 would be my first choice.
Interesting idea, would the use of a plate raise it too high to use standard height sights?Quote:
Originally Posted by Rick R
I’m not sure. I should have taken the dummy plate off of the slide and mounted the #4 plate to see how the sights work out. The window of 320 SCS “seemed” to be lower than my previous RDS, now I’m even more curious.Quote:
Originally Posted by Corse
FYI, The SCS carry is available at Freedom gorilla, I just got an in stock notification today. Uses the K footprint to give you an easier time with stock height sights. The eps carry definitely allowed using regular sights through the optic on a DPP titanium plate.
Is the DPP the one from Amazon? That would be a great option if it does allow standard sights with the EPS carry.Quote:
Originally Posted by Chefdog
That’s correct. The fit to the slide as well as the fit of the optic to the plate is very precise on the two examples I have. This is a 10-8 rear & Warren tactical .215 front with EPS carry on a g19. Attachment 116209Quote:
Originally Posted by Corse